The Math of Delegates
Posted by: Cogito in 2008 Cycle, Barack Obama, Democratic Primary, Hillary ClintonMy first post in the blog is the math to the Democratic Presidential Nomination between Senator Barack Obama and Senator Hillary Clinton. This has been a highly contentious and very close race between two strong candidates and their campaigns.
The nomination, by DNC rules, is decided by delegate majority. Currently the magic number is 2,024 delegates to win the nomination. Neither Obama nor Clinton are able to attain that number of delegates without a certain amount of superdelegates. However, Obama currently holds the lead in elected delegates, while Clinton holds the superdelegate lead. More importantly is that Clinton’s lead in superdelegates has been greatly reduced since Super Tuesday, so that she holds a lead of approximately 30 superdelegates (at one time, that lead was over 100).
Another contention is the seating of the delegations from Florida and Michigan. Both states moved their primaries ahead of Super Tuesday (February 5th), which is against DNC rules. The result is both Florida and Michigan delegations will not be seated at the National Convention in August, per the current decision of the DNC (which could change). I am sure I will go in depth at some time in the near future the details and timeline of these actions. However, I am not going to exclude them from the delegate math below.
Again, let me restate - by DNC rules state that the nomination is to be determined by delegate count. Not by states won, not whether they were primary or caucus wins, not whether they are “red” or “blue” states, and, finally, not based upon the popular vote. Both remaining candidates, and their campaigns stated in the beginning that the nomination is about the delegate count. Only recently, when one campaign began to see their chances slipping in gaining a delegate lead did that campaign want to change the rules they had agreed to work by. However, rules are rules and they are there for a reason - so that there is no doubt and no ambiguity in who the nominee is to be.
Below is a table of current delegate and superdelegate estimates includes numbers found on Real Clear Politics and The Green Papers web sites. The remaining 10 states/territories left to vote in their elections for the Democratic nomination are also listed with my estimate of results in each state.
How did I figure the remaining 10 states? First, I viewed recent polls, where available. Then, I applied rough approximate percentages to each of the sets of elected delegates available in that state, usually:
- Pledged PLEOs (based upon state-/territory- wide percentage of votes)
- Pledged At-Larges (based upon state-/territory- wide percentage of votes)
- Each Congressional District (based upon percentage of votes within CD)
- Each CD has its own count of delegates to be sent - from 2-9 delegates per CD, varies by CD and state/territory
As you will see - At no time in the coming 10 contests will Clinton be able to get close to, let alone catch up or surpass Obama in the elected delegate count:
| DELEGATE COUNTS PER REAL CLEAR POLITICS (April 6, 2008) | |||||
| State | Date | Delegates | Obama | Clinton | Edwards |
| Iowa | 3-Jan | 45 | 25 | 14 | 6 |
| New Hampshire | 8-Jan | 22 | 9 | 9 | |
| Nevada | 19-Jan | 25 | 13 | 12 | |
| South Carolina | 26-Jan | 45 | 25 | 12 | 8 |
| California | 5-Feb | 370 | 166 | 204 | |
| New York | 5-Feb | 232 | 93 | 139 | |
| Illinois | 5-Feb | 153 | 104 | 49 | |
| New Jersey | 5-Feb | 107 | 48 | 59 | |
| Massachusetts | 5-Feb | 93 | 38 | 55 | |
| Georgia | 5-Feb | 87 | 60 | 27 | |
| Minnesota | 5-Feb | 72 | 48 | 24 | |
| Missouri | 5-Feb | 72 | 36 | 36 | |
| Tennessee | 5-Feb | 68 | 28 | 40 | |
| Colorado | 5-Feb | 55 | 35 | 20 | |
| Arizona | 5-Feb | 56 | 25 | 31 | |
| Alabama | 5-Feb | 52 | 27 | 25 | |
| Connecticut | 5-Feb | 48 | 26 | 22 | |
| Arkansas | 5-Feb | 35 | 8 | 27 | |
| Oklahoma | 5-Feb | 38 | 14 | 24 | |
| Kansas | 5-Feb | 32 | 23 | 9 | |
| New Mexico | 5-Feb | 26 | 12 | 14 | |
| Utah | 5-Feb | 23 | 14 | 9 | |
| Delaware | 5-Feb | 15 | 9 | 6 | |
| Idaho | 5-Feb | 18 | 15 | 3 | |
| North Dakota | 5-Feb | 13 | 8 | 5 | |
| Alaska | 5-Feb | 13 | 9 | 4 | |
| American Samoa | 5-Feb | 3 | 1 | 2 | |
| Washington | 9-Feb | 78 | 52 | 26 | |
| Louisiana | 9-Feb | 56 | 34 | 22 | |
| Nebraska | 9-Feb | 24 | 16 | 8 | |
| Virgin Islands | 9-Feb | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| Maine | 10-Feb | 24 | 15 | 9 | |
| DC | 12-Feb | 15 | 12 | 3 | |
| Maryland | 12-Feb | 70 | 42 | 28 | |
| Virginia | 12-Feb | 83 | 54 | 29 | |
| Wisconsin | 19-Feb | 74 | 42 | 32 | |
| Hawaii | 19-Feb | 20 | 14 | 6 | |
| Democrats Abroad (3 delegates tba) | 21-Feb | 7 | 3 | 1 | |
| Vermont | 4-Mar | 15 | 9 | 6 | |
| Rhode Island | 4-Mar | 21 | 8 | 13 | |
| Ohio | 4-Mar | 141 | 66 | 75 | |
| Texas | 4-Mar | 193 | 99 | 94 | |
| Wyoming | 8-Mar | 12 | 7 | 5 | |
| Mississippi | 10-Mar | 33 | 20 | 13 | |
| Elected Delegates To Date | 1415 | 1251 | |||
| Remaining States | % victory | ||||
| Pennsylvania | 22-Apr | 158 | 70 | 88 | 45%/55% |
| Guam | 6-May | 4 | 1 | 3 | 40%/60% |
| Indiana | 6-May | 72 | 34 | 38 | 45%/55% |
| North Carolina | 6-May | 115 | 61 | 54 | 51%/49% |
| West Virginia | 13-May | 28 | 10 | 18 | 40%/60% |
| Kentucky | 20-May | 51 | 19 | 32 | 40%/60% |
| Oregon | 20-May | 52 | 28 | 24 | 51%/49% |
| Puerto Rico | 3-Jun | 55 | 25 | 30 | 40%/60% |
| Montana | 3-Jun | 16 | 9 | 7 | 51%/49% |
| South Dakota | 7-Jun | 15 | 8 | 7 | 51%/49% |
| Remaining Elected Delegates | 265 | 301 | |||
| Elected Delegates To Date | 1415 | 1251 | |||
| Remaining Elected Delegates | 265 | 301 | |||
| TOTAL ELECTED DELEGATE EST. | 1680 | 1552 | (128 lead) | ||
| Superdelegates (PER RCP) | 221 | 251 | |||
| TOTAL EST. DELEGATE STRENGTH | 1901 | 1803 | (98 lead) | ||
| Florida & Michigan per THE GREEN PAPERS (April 6, 2008) | |||||
| Michigan | 15-Jan | 128 | 0 | 73 | unc-55 |
| Florida | 29-Jan | 185 | 67 | 105 | Edwards-13 |
| FL & MI Totals | 67 | 178 | |||
| TOTAL ELECTED DELEGATE ESTIMATE IF FL & MI WERE COUNTED | |||||
| Elected Delegates To Date | 1415 | 1251 | |||
| Remaining Elected Delegates | 265 | 301 | |||
| TOTAL ELECTED DELEGATE EST. | 1680 | 1552 | |||
| FL & MI Totals (per The Green Papers) | 67 | 105 | |||
| TOTAL W/ FL & MI SEATED | 1747 | 1657 | (90 lead) | ||
| Superdelegates (PER RCP) | 221 | 251 | |||
| TOTAL EST. DELEGATE STRENGTH | 1968 | 1908 | (60 lead) | ||
Even if the DNC reversed its ruling on Florida and Michigan (which is something I will not address is either right or wrong in this post), Obama still has the elected delegate lead after all is said and done on June 3 - by 90 delegates. The superdelegates would be in a very tenuous situation to erase this lead and give Clinton the Democratic Party nomination.
Tags: Alabama, Alaska, America, American, American Samoa, amp, Arizona, Arkansas, august, Barack, Bee, California, campaign, caucus, Center, clinton, Colorado, congress, Connecticut, convention, DC, Delaware, delegate, delegate count, democrat, Democrats Abroad, dnc, election, February, Florida, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Hillary, Hillary Clinton, Idaho, illegitimate, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, June, june 3, Kansas, Kentucky, law, Louisiana, magic number, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, math, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, National, Nebraska, Nevada, New, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nominee, North Carolina, North Dakota, obama, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, percent, politics, poll, Popular, popular vote, preference, president, Presidential, Primaries, primary, Puerto Rico, race, rcp, real clear politics, Rhode Island, Senator Hillary, South Carolina, South Dakota, state, super, superdelegate, superdelegates, Tennessee, Texas, the green papers, Utah, Vermont, Virgin Islands, Virginia, War, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, work, Wrong, Wyoming
Entries (RSS)